|
|
|
|
|
by julianmarq
2068 days ago
|
|
I should have been clearer. My point is not whether there's any basis to Apple being better or not, most everyone knows that's impossible because the average Apple engineer is no better than the average engineer in the rest of FAANG or Microsoft or [insert pretty much every other large company here]. My point is that it's completely irrelevant to the discussion. That Apple fans think Apple is better in no way justifies the practices mentioned in TFA, so their "perception by others in comparison" is not really here nor there. At least as far as I can see, I could be wrong of course. |
|
Average developer quality isn’t going to be the only factor in defect rate. Development process, strategy, technology and management all play a role, and my impression is that all of the major players have had varying defect rates over different era of their development.
But indeed that’s not relevant.
But - I’m not talking about ‘Apple fans’. I’m talking about the public perception.
Apple is obviously treated differently from the other players, when it comes to media coverage.
That isn’t a justification for anything - I have in more than one place said I agree that with Gruber that Apple is wrong to do this.
However it does rebut the argument that things that don’t hurt other companies wouldn’t hurt Apple, and it may partially explain their choices.