[sethaurus]

> "Google decided to arbitrarily ban a specific account among billions in order to target one of their employees."

Nobody is claiming that. Malice is not the issue here; the issue is the effect of having an account banned without recourse or transparency.

[theontheone]

The OP is claiming that. It is the purpose of their most recent tweets.

What I'm saying is there shouldn't be outrage until we figure out that the OP isn't lying, which there seems like there is reasonable doubt for. Because for very evil circumstances I wouldn't expect there to be transparency either for legal reasons.