|
|
|
|
|
by atlei
5535 days ago
|
|
Even the most trivial computer programs have lots of bugs (with VERY few exceptions [1]), and we're worrying about creating a super-brain that is actually smarter than we are ourselves ? And let's not forget the debugging, which is TWICE as hard as the coding ;-) We may be able to simulate the hardware of the brain (using "biologic hardware"), but programming the AI software is probably greatly under-estimated.... [1] Some of the NASA software is probably as close to bug-free as we get, and check the required amount of planning, documentation and testing compared to the amount of actual code produced
- http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/06/writestuff.html |
|
The actual program will be small. The brain is clearly a learning agent in a task environment. The sensors and actuators are implementable, the only real question is what algorithm should process the input stimuli.