|
|
|
|
|
by bob33212
2078 days ago
|
|
I have done this for years. I have seen that some people don't like it for the following reasons. 1. They prefer a predictable schedule.
2. They don't like being at home ( family or workspace issues)
3. They are good at or enjoy office politics.
4. They are incompetent managers and they don't know how to manage engineers other than looking over shoulders and taking attendence. |
|
As a counterpoint, we had a mix of remote department and in-office departments at my last company. Transitioning to fully remote made marked an increase in politics every time.
It sounds counterintuitive at first, but fully remote moves even more conversations to side channels. At the office it’s hard to have secret exclusionary meetings without other people noticing eventually. Online, you can create a private Slack channel or even a separate off-Slack group for the in-crowd where you exclude others, and no one can see it.
The politicians also developed a habit of meeting up in person (lunch, shared work days, etc) in ways that strengthened their political power. Ironically, having everyone go remote was a catalyst for giving the politicians a leg up on relationship building.
We still saw upsides of remote work, but I’ve lost all illusions that remote work is an improvement for office politics. If anything, the extra effort required for relationship-building in remote teams just gives the politicians more of a moat to protect their political domain.