Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Animats 2079 days ago
Flywheel energy storage has been proposed many times, and built a few times. Flywheel-powered buses have been deployed. Not too successfully.

EMALS uses a big flywheel to power aircraft carrier catapults. The flywheel energy storage seems to cause most of the problems. The next generation of that system may use ultracapacitors.[1]

[1] https://www.ga.com/capacitors/military-mil-spec-capacitors

2 comments

It seems that the flywheel is a monolithic system, and the proposed next gen ultracapacitor is a modular system.

You probably only have one giant flywheel, as the mass is where the energy storage gains make it worthwhile. Maybe you have many of them in parallel, but the size would make scaling an issue. Not to mention that there’s an associated drivetrain and linkages and so on. It’s a fully integrated contraption. It works, but many parts must work in tandem for it to be so.

This is in contrast to an electronic system, which would benefit from miniaturization and isolated redundancy. Racks of capacitors could run as hot spares when energy is abundant next to racks that may be down for maintenance. I doubt that a flywheel can be meaningfully inspected, let alone repaired or upgraded while operating.

That is the benefit of a modular approach to certain problems and not others. The two approaches are not always mutually exclusive either. Capacitors could be used as regenerative brakes for flywheels, for instance.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monolithic_system

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modular_design

It's not monolithic vs modular...it's controlling a large amount of angular momentum / kinetic energy instead of... not having to do that.
UT Austin's cannon-caliber railgun had some impressive pulsed-power output from flywheels for demos (a 150g projectile launched at nearly 2km/s), but they were fired a single-digit numbers of times.
It would seem that flywheels can store a lot of energy, but due to the form of the energy storage (kinetic) it’s difficult to discharge the current quickly, so to speak. Especially compared to something like a capacitor which is designed for rapidly discharging a literal current, as opposed to the analogous metaphorical motive current in a flywheel.
The flywheels GP refers to were homopolar generators [1]. They created an impressive current pulse, and extracted almost all the kinetic energy in less than one revolution.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homopolar_generator

Like running an electromagnet in reverse to salvage current from a free-spinning motor? I’m trying to understand how the fields and forces interact.
There is a paper [1] published that documents one of the early 1980's designs they used.

[1] https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/bitstream/handle/2152/30...

A different paper specifically mentioning the railgun shows a more traditional alternator design:

https://web.archive.org/web/20151017100843/http://www.utexas...

Huh, I thought they used an alternator like design: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compensated_pulsed_alternato...