[dheera]

> Well maybe it's what everyone else wants.

It's not what I want either, and it's not what most other Linux users I know want either.

It's copying the behavior of MacOS, plain and simple, and I disagree with them doing that. I don't use MacOS because I don't like MacOS, and the last thing I want is MacOS-like Linux.

[qwerty456127]

> It's copying the behavior of MacOS, plain and simple

And of Windows 7-8-10 (and of Unity). And the opposite is just copying the behavior of Windows 95-2000 (XP would already group taskbar buttons by default although it still couldn't "pin" them and required separate launcher buttons).

And, by the way, MacOS doesn't group all the windows by default, some get a separate icon when launched (at least they did some years ago, I don't know about the recent versions).

> I don't use MacOS because I don't like MacOS, and the last thing I want is MacOS-like Linux.

Fortunately, there are many different WMs/DEs on Linux and you don't have to use KDE (or its default set-up) either. You can either tweak it, or choose a different WM/DE or write your own (I would totally do so if I had more spare time).

[eitland]

> I don't use MacOS because I don't like MacOS, and the last thing I want is MacOS-like Linux.

Same here, but grouping applications when the taskbar is full isn't too unreasonable, is it? It is not even necessarily copied from Mac, it might have been Windows who introduced or at least made it mainstream I think (It wouldn't surprise me at all if it existed on some Linux Desktop environment as an option before that.)

[dheera]

The taskbar is never that full for me. I usually use more virtual workspaces when there is too much stuff in one workspace.

[eitland]

Good for you. Then you can set the taskbar to not group applications :-)

[heavyset_go]

It's a setting you can change.