|
|
|
|
|
by evgen
2079 days ago
|
|
Metal anything dropped from orbit at the speeds we are talking about would either burn up in the atmosphere or else hit the ocean surface and become lots of small chunks of something that is now sinking to the ocean floor. You need to shed a huge amount of delta-V just to get to the point where the landing site is described using any term other than 'impact crater.' Most of the mechanisms for dumping this energy tend to be a bit tricky to pull off and I am not sure, but there might be an upper limit after which ablation stops being a viable option. |
|
You can certainly get the speed down enough so that the words impact crater wouldn't be in the report, also you smack them into oceans not land (though smacking them into the desert would be an option I guess if you could shed enough speed).
For a 10 meter sphere of nickel foam with a density of 2000kg/m3 (so about 60% 'air' by volume) it's ~2000 miles per hour[1].
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/airfri2.html#c5
Fast but not insurmountable.
That sphere would be ~8000 tonnes of pure nickel minus ablative losses (which would reduce the impact speed).
Of course you'd want the density to be below 1000KG/m3 or it'd sink.
So a 10m sphere at 850kg/m3 would have a terminal velocity of ~1300 miles per hour - or about mach 2 and you'd be picking up about 3500 tonnes of pure nickel bobbing about.
I'd quite like to see that actually (from a good distance away).