| This is fairly far from my field, but as I understand it, that would be a hidden variable interpretation of QM [1], and specifically in that analogy a local hidden variable theory. That's what Einstein himself wanted. There is a famous test, Bell's inequality [2], that specifically rules out local hidden variable interpretations of QM. Nonlocal hidden variable interpretations, such as De Broglie - Bohm theory [3], are potentially still on the table, however. It is somewhat ironic that Bell's theorem is sometimes presented in popular media as a general disproof of all hidden variable theories, in a context where locality is taken for granted -- because Bell himself seems to have been partial to nonlocal hidden variable theories. An article by the same Mermin mentioned in the OP is worth a read, on this subject [4]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hidden_variable_theory [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell%27s_theorem [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Broglie%E2%80%93Bohm_theory [4] https://cqi.inf.usi.ch/qic/Mermin1993.pdf |
"The Chaotic Ball: An Intuitive Analogy for EPR Experiments"
https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9611037