|
|
|
|
|
by Twisell
2085 days ago
|
|
The whole point is that a "work of art" is by definition copyrightable. That's the whole Oracle line of argumentation. You may disagree but here they are before the supreme court to rule about this. So the only thing I'm confident about is that it's not trivial question. As said by others fair-use is a totally other point and if granted could offer Google some relieve. Oracle must win on both points. |
|