|
|
|
|
|
by pneill
2075 days ago
|
|
Tuition is a drop in the bucket of the funding model for a research university. The majority of university funding comes from research grants and that's why the piece they take off the top is so outrageously high. Note that I don't question your point about the use of international student fees to subsidize domestic students. I'm just saying reducing the cost for students can be done many, many other ways. The point I'm making is that the US tax paper should not pay for foreign students to take US jobs. And if we tightened up that we might not need so many H-1B visas. |
|
Looking at Form 990 for several top private research universities:
Harvard: $1,462M tuition vs $592M government grant
Yale: $680M tuition vs $528M government grant
Princeton: $369M tuition vs $293M government grant
Stanford: $938M tuition vs $1,299M government grant
As you go down in research activity, the differences only get bigger.
Rochester Institute of Technology: $501m tuition vs $113m government grant
University of New Haven: $214m tuition vs $6m government grant
U.S. taxpayers are not paying for foreign students. Foreign students are paying for themselves, and then some.