Plenty of perfectly healthy people are also dying of COVID-19, even with the efforts to slow its spread. If we didn’t work to slow its spread, our healthcare system would rapidly collapse.
This was the entire "15 days to slow the spread" narrative. It's been 8 months. None of our hospitals collapses or were overwhelmed, except in states like Michigan and NYC where governors send the infected back to elder care facilities.
Most hospitals in the US never even got close to peak usages. Many people died because they were afraid to go to the hospitals or couldn't get surgeries they were scheduled for.
> Most hospitals in the US never even got close to peak usages.
Texas ICUs came very close to peak usage, and Florida was also running near capacity in many ICUs. Hospitals like TMC managed by making "surge" ICU beds and bringing in resources from out of state. We don't know the impact of these surges on quality of care, but Texas was losing a 7-day average of 325 lives per day at its peak in August. These happen to be the states with a combination of high population density cities and some of the fewest COVID countermeasures; more rural states and states with stronger countermeasures didn't approach capacity.
The article you link doesn't say anything about ICU capacity surging in a manner that compares with COVID this year. It talks mostly about tents outside of emergency rooms. COVID deaths this year are already 173% of the deaths from the 2017-18 flu season, and most sources indicate that these numbers actually underestimate the real toll.
Although fatality estimates are important for understanding the risk of viral spread to people in different age groups, they don’t tell the full story of the toll COVID-19 takes, says Kilpatrick. “There is a fascination with death, but COVID-19 appears to cause a substantial amount of long-term illness,” he adds.
Yes, but there are at least 100 million people (probably a lot more) still at risk in the US alone. An optimistic scenario of 0.1% of 100 million over six months requiring hospital care is 17,000 people per month being admitted to hospital for covid-19 alone. The level of care many of these people require is very high. We don't have the capacity to do it with our current healthcare system, even with these generous assumptions.
Individual risk is low, but collective risk is unacceptably high.
And "healthy" is difficult at best. Is an overweight person healthy? Is a normal weight person that doesn't exercise healthy?
And "healthcare system would rapidly collapse." Makes no sense. You mean our hospitals would be full for a few months. It's not like the healthcare industry would be destroyed.
> And "healthcare system would rapidly collapse." Makes no sense. You mean our hospitals would be full for a few months. It's not like the healthcare industry would be destroyed.
I would like to remind you of the situation in northern Italy in february. People suffocating in hospitals on chairs in the corridor, because there was no one to look after them and no beds for them to lay down. And that was not because the doctors were absent, it was because they were overwhelmed by the amount of sick people.
Perhaps you prefer an US example, I'd say it is sign of a collapsing health care system, if they have so many deaths, that they don't know were to put the bodies. That happened in New York City, not some rural place with too few hospitals.
And the linked article isn't about north Italy. From where do you have the information that north Italian are regularly collapsing, because of the seasonal flu? Full hospitals are not the same as hospitals out of space to keep patients and bodies. Have a look at this impression https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-they-call-it-the-apoc...
> Plenty of perfectly healthy people are also dying of COVID-19, even with the efforts to slow its spread. If we didn’t work to slow its spread, our healthcare system would rapidly collapse.
> If we didn’t work to slow its spread, our healthcare system would rapidly collapse.
Is that really the case though? We keep hearing of a lot more infected, but at the same time the hospitals have a lot of capacity now (across several countries) so what is the risk for the healthcare system right now?
This was the entire "15 days to slow the spread" narrative. It's been 8 months. None of our hospitals collapses or were overwhelmed, except in states like Michigan and NYC where governors send the infected back to elder care facilities.
Most hospitals in the US never even got close to peak usages. Many people died because they were afraid to go to the hospitals or couldn't get surgeries they were scheduled for.