[ifaxmycodetok8s]

If you're question is it a viable alternative to Slack for business purposes, the answer is no. And it's not bc of anything related to the application itself but because of the insane TOS.

> By uploading, distributing, transmitting or otherwise using Your Content with the Service, you grant to us a perpetual, nonexclusive, transferable, royalty-free, sublicensable, and worldwide license to use, host, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, and display Your Content in connection with operating and providing the Service.

https://discord.com/terms

[kevindong]

> in connection with operating and providing the Service

I'm not a lawyer, but that seems like a key limiting clause in that statement.

[ifaxmycodetok8s]

yeah agreed. but at the same time it seems just vague enough.

[war1025]

Are these licenses actually enforceable?

Those absolutely seem like overreach in terms of what someone would consider reasonable from a user perspective.

[paxys]

Regardless, I doubt any business wants to get in a position where their existence depends on a judge evaluating the license with their chat software.