|
|
|
|
|
by netcan
2080 days ago
|
|
Is the only allowable statement one that can be backed by quantifiable analysis? I didn't even specify which hobby, so lets go with alpine mountaineering. Hard to be more dangerous than this. Gridiron football has some good quantification, with ways of measuring mental injuries. sheesh. |
|
In different words I asked because sports and hobbies seem like apples to the oranges of psychedelic experiences. In that context I wondered how one would build the basis for comparison, not to mention generate the confidence to make such a bold assertion about the end result.
It would probably be easier to say that the inferential distance was too high for me to follow and I was curious about how you got there.