[bborud]

The freedom to disagree with others. The freedom to marry who you want. The freedom to move about freely in nature without having to worry about property lines.

In some places that are less free, these things are frowned upon.

Edit: you can read about the freedom to move about in nature in certain countries here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_to_roam

[tssva]

"In some places that are less free, these things are frowned upon." They are frowned upon by some because they affect what those people believe their freedoms should entail. None of these are examples of exercising of freedoms that don't affect the freedom of others.

Take for example the freedom to move about freely in nature without having to worry about property lines. This most definitely affects the property rights of others and their freedom to do as they wish with their property. I'm not saying that your freedom of movement shouldn't out rank their property rights and the freedom to do as they will with their own property but it certainly impacts their freedoms.

[bborud]

I think most scandinavians would disagree with you.

In my opinion, someone having a problem with people taking a walk in their forest need help.

(And yes, I grew up on a property that has a forest, and yes, when encountering people going for a walk or gathering mushrooms, one says «hello» and smiles)