[nicoburns]

In my experience users generally do this when their computers are locked down and IT departments are not responsive enough to meet their needs in a timely fashion. It's a paradoxical case of more restrictions making things less secure.

[cameronh90]

Unfortunately user expectations tend to be that they want the account set up immediately, and anything beyond that and someone will try and circumvent it.

It doesn't help that SaaS companies tend to put the things required for security (OIDC, mandatory 2FA, organisation support, sharing restrictions) on the expensive enterprise plans, which mean that IT need to go back to the user and say if they want to use it, they need budgetary approval for the $15k/month version. This either kills it (and makes them sneakily sign up for the personal one) or means it won't get approved until their departments next quarterly budget meeting.

While I understand that SaaS companies want to find unique areas they can use to upsell enterprise customers, I feel pretty strongly about basic security features being used as that leverage. Especially as there are many SMEs like us that work in a regulatorily complex environment but don't necessarily have the budget for the top tier just to get that security (UK finance, so we have GDPR/ePD/PECR as well as PCI-DSS, MIFID II, POCA, and a bunch of other FCA regulations to comply with).

Ultimately this means we end up saying no to users more than we say yes, which as you say, frustrates them and pushes them into shadow IT. Then we need to deploy proxies/CASB to catch users trying to use shadow IT and blocking sites.

[Silhouette]

Under some circumstances, I sympathise a lot with users who are trying to do their jobs, identify a tool that will help them to do their jobs, and then get told "no" by IT, particularly if IT is being obstructive for no apparent reason except throwing its weight around.

However, when you're talking about something like external hosting and transferring data outside of your organisation, I think there is a line that has to be drawn, partly just as a responsible corporate citizen and partly because of the potential liability when laws and regulations such as those you mentioned attempt to mandate that sort of responsible behaviour.

In an obviously sensitive field like finance, healthcare or law, bypassing the rules and setting up shadow IT really should be a serious disciplinary matter, possibly even a firing offence. It is, after all, potentially causing the company to break the law, not to mention creating severe security and privacy risks, and the damage that can be done by a small group or even a single individual can be catastrophic.

[jrochkind1]

Yup. And then IT departments will use users doing it as an excuse for further lockdowns, you can't trust those users after all, look what they do. Vicious circle of mistrust.

[ldiracdelta]

Some IT departments forget they serve their users and aren't their jailers.