[ethbr0]

I've stayed at everything from a Motel 6, to Courtyards / Residence Inns / Sheratons between NYC and San Diego, to Four Seasons / Ritz Carltons.

I stand by my claim. The relative differentiation in niceness is swamped by their mass produced boxness.

Ironically, my favorite road chain tends to be Aloft. At least they're upfront about their capsule-esque nature, in a sort of ironic/not-ironic way?

Least favorite: Embassy Suites. shudders It's like every Disney vacationing family's fantasy about what a hotel should be... packed with every Disney vacationing family. Omelette?

[peferron]

The point of hotel chains, and chains in general, is the consistency of the mass-produced experience. I can walk into a DoubleTree hotel anywhere in the world and get the same welcome cookie. It's a positive, not a negative; people often enjoy knowing what they're going to get. If you prefer a more unique experience, which is perfectly understandable, then simply avoid chains perhaps?

[ethbr0]

That's my point, but extended: I feel like walking into any hotel chain (including different product tiers and luxury brands) gives effectively the same experience.

Don't get me wrong, there's a benefit to consistency of product (especially when you travel Su-F for consulting).

But that benefit, parent company consolidation, and economies of scale drive a net result of overwhelming homogeneity.

[Spooky23]

Totally get your point of view, and I share it in vacation contexts.. As the hotel chains have consolidated, they slice pennies everywhere.

When I'm travel for business or putting my head on a pillow on a roadtrip, consistency makes my life easier and less stressful. I'm a gorilla-sized person :), I would rather stay at higher end hotel that provides an actual bath sheet than a marriott whatever where I have to call for 6 towels. Surprises aren't delightful at 10PM when you've been on the road for 15 hours.