[itsoktocry]

>Never discussed politics at any of the companies I’ve worked for, we were always too busy with...work!

Same, and that's the conundrum.

"Activist" employees put others on the spot by querying coworkers' political views and expecting discussion. And for those who have had their head in the sand for the past few years, things like "being a Joe Rogan fan" are now considered unacceptable politics.

[3np]

> things like "being a Joe Rogan fan" are now considered unacceptable politics

For one who has had their head in the sand and is only vaguely familiar with Joe Rogan; why?

[remarkEon]

My take: he’s generally opposed to this kind of laborious activism and tedious “political correctness” (broadly defined). He’s had some folks on his podcast who are very outspoken on certain things (trans issues, politics, etc) that people find offensive, and they claim he’s a “gateway to the alt right” as a result. Despite Rogan self-identifying as a progressive, the label has pretty much stuck and even though he has an extremely wide variety of guests - from cutting edge technologists to comedians to Snowden - on the show, he’s forever tainted by not aligning to the activists’ goals.

My personal opinion is that they don’t like him because his platform is massive and threatens other traditional means of informing people about what to think on certain topics.

[hajwh]

I think Glenn Greenwald nailed it with this analysis: https://theintercept.com/2020/09/22/as-joe-rogans-platform-g...

[3np]

Thank you. I think this captures a lot of it:

> liberals care far more about proper culture signaling than they do about the much harder and more consequential work of actual politics.

I'd argue this is more about the political climate in the US (and many other places) than about liberals specifically. Arguably for "true liberals" this shouldn't be a consideration at all but might be for conservatives.

[lalaland1125]

Joe Rogan is infamous for inviting white supremacists onto his show.