[web_]

Someone draw the line for me, when does personal responsibility for one’s own health lead to labeling everything a carcinogen?

[GoOnThenDoTell]

Why would anyone assume that a typically sold food (hot dog, bacon etc) causes cancer?

I only found out by looking at the link just now. That’s how important labeling is

[web_]

I am an automotive enthusiast. Nearly every fluid or component I buy has a label on it per Prop 65. I have been wearing gloves all along. What’s the intent?

[thedevilslawyer]

I guess it's that should not remove the gloves when you're working with them?

[web_]

As if anyone would. My point is we cannot legislate around reckless or stupid people. It’s an exercise in futility.

[alilsumpinditto]

Everything isn't a carcinogen. Carcinogens are carcinogens, and they absolutely should be labeled when used.

[rblatz]

Walking around California there are literally prop 65 warnings everywhere. Some stupidly high percent of products I buy come with a prop 65 warning. It sure feels like everything causes cancer, at least in the state of California. The warnings have lost all meaning and I don’t even live in California. It just makes California look paranoid and stupid.

[NikolaeVarius]

We need to stop breathing. Fund Govt interventions to create new Human metabolic pathways

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6646012/

[eplanit]

Many (Californians) disparage the notion of individual responsibility, and see things as collective concerns.

[teej]

Don’t need to draw the line. For better or worse, California has already passed prop 65. This is just suing for the law to be enforced.