|
|
|
|
|
|
by galliher
2090 days ago
|
|
|
Agreed, it's flimsy. Certainly a bit more effort for them spoof it correctly though. Would need to watch traffic on the path back per flow to isolate the number of prior decrements to the TTL leading up to MitM, and then store that value until such time that it sees an SNI it cares about / it's time to generate a reset. |
|
|