Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by xrisk 2085 days ago
Also interesting that they did not find a shred of evidence in that case. In fact the order mentioned that he was convicted to placate the “conscience of the nation”.
3 comments

“The incident, which resulted in heavy casualties, had shaken the entire nation and the collective conscience of the society will only be satisfied if the capital punishment is awarded to the offender.”: [1]

[1] https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/parliament-attac...

when was he hanged?
Supreme court had concluded that he arranged logistics and explosives for the attackers. I am not sure how they arrived at that conclusion without a "shred of evidence".

https://scroll.in/article/805427/the-quick-guide-to-sar-gila...

I meant that all the evidence was circumstantial, which was admitted by even the court.
Isn't this the entire reason we need groups like Amnesty International present, or do you think they're bias/compromised as well?