|
|
|
|
|
|
by loup-vaillant
2096 days ago
|
|
|
Abandoning a feature just because it enables a misuse is the wrong way to do it in my opinion. Yes, some inexperienced, stubborn, stupid, or hurried developers will pass around complex types when they really shouldn't. But no, this drawback does not nullify the massive advantages of (good) static typing. Sure, interfaces should be kept small. Let's to just that, then! Recognise that we want our classes/functions/modules to be deep (small interface/implementation ratio), and frown upon shallow instances in code reviews. No need to give up static typing. |
|
|