|
|
|
|
|
by scarface74
2092 days ago
|
|
I’m not explicitly backpedaling on anything. I argued against the narrative that A) it’s dangerous to hire a third party inverted movers because their might be an interaction between the evicted tenant and the crew moving things out. The police are always involved during a legal eviction when you move the tenant out. B) inverted movers may destroy the property. Secure “storage” in states where the two don’t happen the same day - moving the tenant out and moving their stuff could just be leave it in the house and if they don’t come for it dispose of it however you want - including using inverted movers. Have you ever lived in country X? No? Then you have no right to question anything I say about the politics or history of country X." You are allowed to have your own opinions but not your own facts. One of us have actually gone through the legal eviction process. One of us haven’t. I think I have more credibility. |
|