|
|
|
|
|
by codethief
2099 days ago
|
|
> This security issue is not that simple to manage as you probably know. I do think it's simple to manage: As I already mentioned elsewhere, it wouldn't be necessary for the network-facing part of Traefik to talk to the Docker API. There could be a second Traefik container (w/o network access) running a binary called, say, traefik-config-generator whose only task it is to talk to the Docker socket and generate a config and write that config to a shared volume. EDIT: Oh, I just realized you're the founder of Traefik! Thank you so much for your work! I would really appreciate your opinion on my suggestion – even if you think it's complete BS. :) |
|