|
|
|
|
|
by KMnO4
2101 days ago
|
|
Video hosting is actually a lot harder than it seems. - For starters, you need the server space to host it. Videos can be large -- a 10 minute 4k video can be nearly 5gb in size. - Then you need to the CPU to transcode it to various formats and bitrates (Youtube keeps more than 30 different formats sometimes) - Then you need to bandwidth to actually serve all that data. Ideally you have servers geolocated close to the user. As someone with a slow internet connection, I generally despise self hosted videos. If your video won't load because I don't have a >100mbit
connection, I will likely leave. |
|
A successful discovery platform would allow content creators to publish to any platform they want (or their own site), and still maintain their viewership.
> As someone with a slow internet connection, I generally despise self hosted videos.
To this I would say that at this point, storage and CDNs are becoming a commodity, and "self hosted" does not have to mean slow. I can build and host my own site on a home server while still serving videos from GCP CDN. Now I have similar to performance to YouTube without the YouTube.