|
|
|
|
|
by nextgens
2094 days ago
|
|
The answer is complicated. IMHO It's clearly better than no TPM... as for whether it's better or worse than a physical chip, it's a different trade-off. One one side you have: - higher speed - higher protection against physical attacks (if only because the die is larger... it's smaller and the "bus" isn't as trivial to interact with) On the other: - new side channels (think spectre, meltdown & friends) and they are probably easier to exploit thanks to the higher speed (more samples) - more parties to trust (microcode, ME, ...) - erasure is harder For the specific purpose of hardening passphrases/keys ... use both. :p |
|