|
|
|
|
|
by wodenokoto
2099 days ago
|
|
What happens to that methane? Or maybe more accurately, what happens to the building blocks of that methane. Those numbers do not show that we are reducing the output of methane by reducing the input of methane, but that the process itself is generating less methane from basically the same input. |
|
The other small molecules in question seem to be what are called "volatile fatty acids" (VFAs), which i think are more or less the same as "short-chain fatty acids" [0], and they're good for the animal.
Acetate and propionate are two main VFAs. A study on sheep [1] found that "Sheep fed Asparagopsis had a significantly lower concentration of total volatile fatty acids and acetate, but a higher propionate concentration.". If there's less methane and also less VFAs, then i assume less cellulose is being broken down. But more of the carbon from it is going into VFAs.
It would be good to have a study like this in cows.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Short-chain_fatty_acid
[1] https://www.publish.csiro.au/an/an15883