|
|
|
|
|
|
by cure
2099 days ago
|
|
|
> Nuclear nuclear nuclear. There's nothing else that can do it fast enough. Maybe in theory, but not in practice. How much new nuclear generation has been brought online in the last decade in the US? How much solar/wind? Clearly, the only carbon-free power generation that is actually actively being brought online is solar/wind. With batteries, we'll actually get somewhere with the decarbonization of our power generation. It still won't be fast enough at the current pace, though... |
|
|
Isn't that exactly the point? Nuclear could be fast enough, solar wind can't.
Of course we'll need to bring down nuclear costs, not a lot, but at least some.