|
|
|
|
|
|
by tracker1
2096 days ago
|
|
|
My understanding, especially with WSL1, was that there was a concern about the Linux trademark if MS used the name "Linux Subsystem for Windows" which would have been a better name, since WSL1 didn't actually use a Linux kernel. WSL2 does though. "Windows' Linux Subsystem" might have been better as well (WLS), using it as a posessive statement, or "Windows' Subsystem of/with Linux" which would keep the same WSL abbreviation. |
|
|