|
Here is a link to an article with links to the agreement, the order unsealing it, etc. http://paidcontent.org/article/419-righthavens-secret-contra... Upon a quick read, I notice that the Defendants' brief argues, on page 9, section III, that "it appears indisputable that Righthaven's assignment of the cause of action is unvalid under Silvers, rendering Righthaven's claim objectively unreasonable," thus opening the door Righthaven having to pay attorneys fees. EDIT: Here is a quote from the order, regarding Righthaven's arguments: The use of phrases, in the Motion to Strike, such as “underhanded,” “a ruse,” “blatantly ignored,” “brazen attempt,” “fumbling attempt,” “purposefully muddle,” and “Defendants’ complaint reeks of hypocrisy,” is a very unprofessional attempt to attack counsel rather than address the issues. There is an old adage in the law that, if the facts are on your side, you pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, you pound on the law. If neither the facts nor the law is on your side, you pound on the table. It appears there is a lot of table pounding going on here. |