|
|
|
|
|
by kazinator
2100 days ago
|
|
I implemented exactly the same thing 20 years ago. It looked something like: Dynamic<int> foo; // define at global scope
{
DynamicBind<int> foo; // re-bind dynamically
}
It used thread-local storage and all. The global constructor for the Dynamic<> template class would allocate the thread specific key. The DynamicBind<> template class did the saving, location altering, and restoring. |
|