[zerocrates]

Is there any movement on the Git side?

I'm assuming this doesn't actually apply if you follow the more "classic" method of creating a Github repo: creating a local git repo and just adding Github as a remote.

Edit: I figured that Git itself probably wouldn't change the default branch name (at least not easily), but thought that just making it configurable would be a "neutral" way to make it easier for people to do this if they wanted to.

I guess they, in fact, already did that: https://superuser.com/a/1572156

[nprateem]

> Is there any movement on the Git side?

Why should there be?