[myraahio]

Hi, Thanks for your feedback you are right. Currently algo evaluate how a user will feel...when they look at your site above the fold...it's like tinder you just look at the pic and decide to swap right or left.. this is based on : Users make lasting judgments about a website’s appeal within a split second. This first impression is influential enough to later affect their opinions of a site’s usability and trustworthiness...of course lot of areas we can improve...hope u enjoyed..

[Aeolun]

But do users really enjoy full size hero images?

[myraahio]

That's the reason why program says it's good..

[lionkor]

I think your project will not be taken seriously by the target audience if you imply that the AI isnt extremely biased, as any "pretty or not" judgement.

Providing a "what people might like better statistically" service is interesting, claiming you have a "the AI knows how the user will feel" algorithm is not a good strategy

[KaoruAoiShiho]

Is it an actual AI though, trained through objective data or some kind of human programmed analysis?

[myraahio]

It's a deep learning model..hence sometimes illogical as well :). Thanks for trying...it will learn and improve over time...

[aavshr]

By improving over time do you mean training the model for more epochs or having some kind of feedback loop that tells the algorithm whether the score was accurate or not based on human input?

I think the later makes more sense. Some kind of input from the users like "I actually liked the website visually" when the algorithm gives a low score and vice-versa would help the model be more accurate?

[KaoruAoiShiho]

What kind of data are you inputting and is it objective? You know the truism in ML... garbage in garbage out.