[ikeboy]

>So I'm assuming you're saying that they shouldn't hire in India apparently because of less than minimum wage.

That's not what I said.

>So these kinds of things can be avoided if Amazon were to hire decision makers who make minimum wage or whatever the lowest amount they can get away with in US?

That would address some of the issues and not others, all of which were laid out in my original comment. (Hint: read the words after "Indian".)

>process sales and purchases

This had nothing to do with my comment, which is clearly not about people processing sales.

[frequentnapper]

>That would address some of the issues and not others, all of which were laid out in my original comment. (Hint: read the words after "Indian".)

I originally literally quoted the entire sentence from your original comment, which came after "Indian". We could do without the snide remarks. I was genuinely trying to get your position, but all you are doing is making snide remarks and attempting to make yourself sound more knowledgeable than you are about the issue.

[ikeboy]

You twice made incorrect assumptions about what I believed. That's not necessary if you're just trying to understand it.

Now you're asserting that I'm lacking some knowledge about the issue, without bothering to specify what knowledge, specifically, I might be lacking.

This is not how good faith conversations tend to go.