|
|
|
|
|
by elefanten
2107 days ago
|
|
It seems like the spirit of your comment is in accord with GP. GGP put forth that Zinn is "the truth." GP may have phrased it a bit dismissively but I read that comment as making the same argument you do: no given history book contains the final truth. As for GP's comment that Zinn has no place today -- you offer a more nuanced take. But we're in a moment replete with valorizing paeans to Zinn (like TFA) and calls for using People's History more widely as a _textbook_. Maybe, given that we are 40 years on from it's writing, that's not the best move. |
|