[dllthomas]

Then although I agree, I'm still not sure I follow.

> It does not [support chained comparisons], so the argument is very much valid.

Was your comment to the effect of "although Go does not support chained comparisons, it is syntactically valid for a comparison operator to be passed the result of a comparison so the issue can still arise"?

That's valid, but I would have expected "but" in place of "so".

(sorry if it seems I'm picking nits; I'm just trying to understand and explaining my attempts)