|
|
|
|
|
|
by millettjon
2098 days ago
|
|
|
See: https://www.news-medical.net/news/20200731/Research-suggests... In addition to immunity based on T cells, the HIT depends on how individuals are networked. The original 60-70% estimates were based on 100% of people being vulnerable and also a random distribution of individuals interacting. In reality a small fraction of the population will have many interactions and once they become immune those transmission vectors away and the average R number drops. So based on the latest research plus observations of the worst hit places, 20-25% seems plausible. |
|
|