|
|
|
|
|
|
by CyberRabbi
2108 days ago
|
|
|
Two logical issues with that position: 1. Why do you believe that No. 2 can make valuable contributions to Zig if you do not value his contributions to Zen? 2. Why do you believe that No. 2 would be a potential contributor to Zig if he weren’t otherwise legally restricted? |
|
|
Because the project does not care for Zen's desired direction and following this direction is the form No. 2's contributions to Zen would have taken as they were a contractor to Zen.
The contributions No. 2 would make to the Zig project as an individual and independent of Zen are… unrelated to the direction Zen wants.
> 2. Why do you believe that No. 2 would be a potential contributor to Zig if he weren’t otherwise legally restricted?
Because No. 2 is the number two contributor to Zig and is actively stopped from contributing by the NCC. That's literally in the statement.