Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by macintux 2106 days ago
It sure seems like collectively the world has wasted more than $10m of attention on this concept by now.
3 comments

Unrelated to the thread topic:

We live in an attention economy. If you read a story, or watch a video, it doesn't matter if you agree or disagree with the content; you're still traffic.

Just viewing content on most of the internet boosts it's signal, and creates value for someone; much less engaging further by commenting, up/down voting, or sharing it. It's a pretty ugly system.

The most surefire way to acquire massive wealth in the 21st century is to get convince people to pay as much attention to your app's notifications as they would an incoming phone call.
Putting another $10m to follow it would be chasing good money after bad, and fall into the sunk cost fallacy.
Since nothing has been proven or disproven yet, we’re really in no different position that before all the experiments began. Might as well spend that money now to end it.
It fits so far out of our theoretical models that it's unfair to say it isn't proven or disproven. There are virtually infinite hypothesis that are neither proven nor disproven experimentally, but because theory states it's impossible we don't consider them worth testing.
Getting a dollar from a million people is a different thing to getting a million dollars from one person.