[RandoHolmes]

I guess slavery is worth having since someone, somewhere, "chose" to do it...

Wait, what's that!?!? Are you saying it's acceptable for society to make decisions for those who don't have the leverage to protect themselves?!?! WHAT?!?!? Say it aint so Mr Magoo, say it aint so...

Cause I hurd if you ever make a decision for another human being you're immoral, making all parents immoral. That's just how this shit wurks my brutha!

[ColanR]

> I guess slavery is worth having since someone, somewhere, "chose" to do it...

Are you suggesting that "someone, somewhere" chose to do something that intentionally made them worse off than they were before?

[RandoHolmes]

I'd like to buy "what is stockholm's syndrome for 500 alex!".

https://www.britannica.com/science/Stockholm-syndrome

The better question. Are you implying this doesn't exist and therefore the woman in question is guilty?

I mean, not that this has anything to do with the overarching point, but.... you're so wrong that you're wrong even when you're wrong.

enter: BUT I'M GOING TO DEFINE FREEWILL SO IT DOESN'T INCLUDE STOCKHOLME SYNDROME...

yeah ok.... That certainly makes you ... biased.

[ColanR]

You seem incoherent. Apparently you're implying I have stockholm syndrome, which is at best an ad homenim. Then you mention some woman I've never heard of, and conclude by asserting that I'm super duper wrong...which isn't particularly informative, useful or even appropriate in a discussion.

To top it off, your grammar is atrocious.

EDIT: I'll ask my question again, with better wording, just for good measure. Are you suggesting that when people look for work, they accept jobs that leave them worse off than they were before?

[dang]

"Don't feed egregious comments by replying; flag them instead."

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html