| It's hard to know what to make of your comment. Consider the perspective of others reading it: You allude to a government conspiracy but don't elaborate. You say you investigated this story, but don't describe your investigation (ie. Did you interview victims or did you read blogs online?). You mention this all happened on Wikipedia so presumably there exists some kind of paper trail, but you don't provide any supporting evidence. You describe "random objects" in your mail but don't describe them. From the reader's perspective this story could be: 1. An unbiased account of a (unnamed) government unfairly wielding their influence over Wikipedia 2. The result of someone upset that their Pizzagate exposé wasn't being taken seriously on Wikipedia 3. An exercise in creative writing Some kind of supporting evidence would greatly improve your comment. |
If you want specifics, I suppose I could mail you those. I fully agree that the account sounds fantastical and psychotic, but it is what I was comfortable sharing. I also think it is a smart tactic if you wanted to discredit someone. I never told anyone close to me either and completely submitted after the article was deleted.