[toomanyrichies]

> ...you also have to consider that an exact prediction would start people wondering if he couldn't have prevented them.

This sounds an awful lot like the "When he's right, he should be lauded, but when he's wrong it's because of $valid_reason." Am I summarizing what you're saying accurately?

And if so, I have to ask- is there anything which would convince you that QAnon is untrustworthy and/or full of BS? If so, what would that be?