|
|
|
|
|
|
by matt_kantor
2111 days ago
|
|
|
Looks like I misread your comment when posting my other reply (I was talking about one-to-one). Sorry about that. I'm not sure what the few/many distinction is about, but I can guess: if they only said "one-to-many" it could be unclear whether "many" means "more than one" or "some sufficiently large number", so they include "few" to remove ambiguity. Said another way: "one-to-few and one-to-many" is just a different way to say "one to more than one". As far as I can tell the new guidelines don't use the few/many distinction anywhere and only mention both in this one sentence. |
|
|