[williamdix]

I think it's very worthwhile to read the original article in this case as it supports something far less strong than what the Ars article does. It's argument is pretty compelling when you get to what it's actual argument is/should have been. But it hardly topples what it claims to.

[compay]

Yeah, I tried to be careful to criticize only the Ars article, since I imagine there's a strong possibility the original may have been misquoted or misinterpreted.