|
|
|
|
|
by est31
2110 days ago
|
|
> "Therefore, we emphasize that our method is not suitable for sensitive image contents, such as, e.g., storing medical images, or important documents." As an example of this going wrong previously, xerox had once implemented compression based on deduplicating duplicate parts of documents. Obviously numbers contains tons of duplicate symbols (digits). The problem was that the scanner software deduplicated different numbers with each other, leading to wrong numbers. http://www.dkriesel.com/en/blog/2013/0802_xerox-workcentres_... |
|