|
|
|
|
|
by mikepmalai
5540 days ago
|
|
In the article you say, "...we also took the initiative to set our own valuation. Investors were very value-conscious in those days. It's not just enough to be a solid opportunity, you also need to be a good value. We set a price we thought was fair and wouldn't generate a lot of push back." Don't need to disclose the actual number but how did you determine what was a "fair" valuation. Was it a discount to prevailing valuations? Did all investors buy in at the same valuation or were the terms more generous for the first investors? |
|