|
|
|
|
|
by stewbrew
2102 days ago
|
|
The "social sciences" include a lot. Wrt Sociology, I'd say one problem is the overemphasis on quantitative methods - they try to be as serious as the big boys. The best sociological research I've read was qualitative though. Questionable replicability is of course built-in in this type of research but the research dealt with relevant questions. Most quantitative sociology seems rather irrelevant to me. Another problem is of course that most quantitative sociologists don't have a clue what they are doing. They don't even know the basics of statistics and then use some statistical methods they don't understand. It's some kind of overcompensation, I think. Although, psychologists are even worse in this respect. It's really fun to watch an psychologists torturing SAS. I write this as someone who was originally trained as sociologist and over the years turned into a data scientist. |
|
I ask because I’m enrolled in a research program in “computational humanities”. My initial feeling towards the program is that it’s kind of a sham.
Computational Humanities seems to be as computational as an accountant using Excel for their work. Not that I particularly mind, I’m not very interested in the computational aspect at all.