|
|
|
|
|
|
by itsdrewmiller
2100 days ago
|
|
|
I think his point here is that the effect in replication is closer to 0 than to the original claim. It might be more obvious if he chose an order of magnitude difference as an example - going from the dominant factor to technically-not-nothing might be replication but it's not vindication. |
|
|