|
|
|
|
|
by Spivak
2107 days ago
|
|
The problem with this line of thinking is that Apple doesn't take a 30% cut to be your payment processor but to sell on the iPhone at all. Being the sole payment processor just happens to be convenient collection mechanism. Would you still migrate to a 3rd-party payment processor if you still had to pay the 30% fee to apple and pay the 3rd party payment processing fees? |
|
I assume the market would quickly drive Apple‘s fee down to a reasonable number.
But if Apple wants to keep charging 30%, why not? There are alternatives in my plan, so it’s not hostile.