[jeffbee]

I believe in the contiguous USA the furthest you can get from a road is only 20 miles. There are no undisturbed places left, really. Unfortunately preserving roadless areas is politically contentious here. Clinton enacted a roadless area rule at the end of his administration and Bush tried to reverse it a week later.

[grecy]

It's a fact the furthest you can get from a McDonald's while anywhere in the lower 48 is only 115 miles!

http://www.datapointed.net/2010/09/distance-to-nearest-mcdon...

[refurb]

Not sure I believe the 20 miles thing unless you could count an old road that hasn't been used in 100 years as "developed".

There are massive swaths of land in the lower 48 that are pretty much untouched beyond a few footpaths that are rarely used.

[jeffbee]

Well, go right ahead and name any place that is, say, fifty miles from a road.

[rcpt]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2018/02/20/using...

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-42104894

The best one can do is 21 miles from a road - in Yellowstone

[petepete]

I just had a go and thought I'd found somewhere with a 60km road-free radius, then zoomed out and found that I'd strayed into Mexico.

Sugar bunker, just NW of Las Vegas has a few places with 50km (~30 miles) though.

[ptmcc]

I agree, but the fact that there was a forest/logging road in that area as recently as 50 years ago does indicate that it is an environment recently impacted by humans.

[volkl48]

Yeah, I'm pretty sure that statistic includes every Forest Service road on the books.

[jeffbee]

Yes, clearly. In what way is a forest road not a road?

https://www.google.com/maps/@39.7775746,-122.9327754,2401a,3...

[refurb]

I think when people think “road” they think something maintained and well used.

A forestry or old logging road that hasn’t been used in 50 years doesn’t come to mind.

[aembleton]

Looks in remarkably good condition for something that hasn't been used for 50 years. You can even see tyre marks: https://www.google.com/maps/@39.7941501,-122.9358659,3a,75y,...

[jeffbee]

I can't really know what people think is or isn't a road but these are objectively roads and I think you are understating the extent to which resource extraction activities use these roads today, and the degree to which any road, no matter how much or little used, alters the ecosystem through which it passes.

[refurb]

A road (dirt trail) that hasn't been in use for 100 years is not impacting the ecosystem to any extent at all.

[aspaceman]

The point is that humans have touched it. There’s a perception there’s large segments of the American West and Midwest that haven’t been touched. Which is what they’re describing. Almost every place, at one point or another was close to the road. When we’ve only had cars for the last 100 or so, that’s quite a statement.

You’re splitting hairs.

[refurb]

People really believe there are parts of the west and mid-west that haven't been "touched" (we're changing the discussion here)?

The entire country has been surveyed, so of course it's been touched (as defined by some human presence at some point in time).