[jerf]

Yeah, but not in the way I meant. The way I meant is that you have actual coding abilities in the CSS, because "more power is better". I now understand how that is not true, how it is generally better to be parsimonious with the power in your language (just enough to get the job done), and if you can avoid (convenient) Turing Completeness it's usually a good idea in a declarative UI language. But you can still do forward-declaration non-code replacements without opening the door to Turing-chaos.